Kissinger, Schmidt, and Huttenlocher aren’t afraid to explore the darker side of AI either. They are lucid about the ways in which AI could allow dictators to monitor their citizens and manipulate information to incite people to commit violence.
While AI is already improving our lives in many ways, Kissinger, Schmidt, and Huttenlocher warn that it will take us many years as a species to create a system as powerful as we deserve. They wisely suggest not to lose sight of the values we want to instill in this new artificial intelligence.
Thanks GPT-3! Now a few remarks:
First, AI has not been a complete success. It took Sudowrite a few tries. On the first attempt, he spat out a series of continuous sentences that hinted that GPT-3 had stuck in some sort of weird, recursive loop. (It began, “The book you’re reading right now is a book on a corner, which is a book on a book, which is a book on a subject, which is a subject on a subject, which is a subject on a subject. subject. ”) A few essays later, he seemed to give up the task of reviewing books altogether and just started listing the names of tech companies. (“Google, Facebook, Apple, Amazon, IBM, Microsoft, Baidu, Tencent, Tesla, Uber, Airbnb, Twitter, Snap, Alibaba, WeChat, Slack.”)
But it quickly heated up, and within minutes the AI came up with some incredibly compelling analysis paragraphs – some, frankly, better than I could have generated on my own.
This fits with one of the recurring themes of “Age of AI,” which is that while today’s AI systems can be clunky and erratic at times, they are improving quickly and will soon be. match or exceed human skills in a number of important areas. tasks, by solving problems in a way that no human would have thought of solving them. At this point, the authors write, AI will “transform all areas of human experience.”
Second, while GPT-3 was right about the scope of “Age of AI” – with chapters on everything from social media algorithms to autonomous weapons – it didn’t note that all of this magnitude has a significance. cost. The book seems superficial and superficial in places, and many of its recommendations are strangely vague.
In a chapter on the geopolitical risks posed by AI, the authors conclude that “the nations of the world must make urgent decisions about what is compatible with the concepts of inherent human dignity and moral agency.” (OK, we’ll get there!) A brief section on TikTok – an app used by more than a billion people around the world, whose ownership by a Chinese company raises rightfully fascinating questions about national sovereignty and freedom of movement. ‘phrase – ends with the throwaway observation that “more complex geopolitical and regulatory puzzles await us in the near future”. And when the authors make specific recommendations – such as a proposal to restrict the use of AI in the development of biological weapons – they fail to specify how such an outcome could be achieved, or who might oppose it.